You say you want collaboration. Team selling. Flawless handoffs. Happy customers who renew forever.
But your comp planโ€ฆ tells a very different story.

Walk the sales floor at any SaaS company and youโ€™ll see the same dysfunction playing out in real time:

  • AEs hoarding accounts like doomsday preppers stockpiling toilet paper ๐Ÿงป

  • CS teams inheriting overpromised deals that never had a shot ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

  • SDRs passing garbage leads just to hit demo quota ๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ

  • SEs getting ghosted because they โ€œslow things downโ€ ๐Ÿ‘ป

  • Partners ignored because they dilute the commission split ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ

This isnโ€™t bad behavior.
This is math.


โš™๏ธ The System Is Working Exactly As Designed

Sales compensation is a system. And systems do exactly what theyโ€™re built to doโ€”not what you preach during the quarterly all-hands.

  • If your comp plan only rewards individual heroics, youโ€™ll never get team plays.

  • If it only pays on closed revenue, youโ€™ll never get qualified pipeline.

  • If it ignores post-sale impact, youโ€™ll never get long-term growth.

The worst part? We try to fix misalignment with culture, not compensation.

Cue the speeches about โ€œwinning togetherโ€ ๐Ÿค.
The CEO gets misty-eyed about collaboration ๐Ÿฅฒ.
The CRO pounds the podium about customer-centricity ๐ŸŽค.

Then everyone goes back to their quota sheet and does exactly what theyโ€™re paid to do: protect their own interests.

You flash a leaderboard that pits everyone against each other, then wonder why nobody collaborates ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰.
You create SPIFFs for individual performance, then act surprised when reps sandbag deals.
You pay AEs nothing on renewals, then blame them for sloppy handoffs.


๐Ÿ“‰ The Real Cost of Misaligned Incentives

This isnโ€™t philosophical. Itโ€™s financial. And itโ€™s ugly:

  • Companies with misaligned sales/CS incentives see 23% higher churn

  • Deal velocity drops 31% when SEs arenโ€™t compensated for involvement

  • SDR-sourced pipeline quality falls 40% when paid purely on meeting volume

  • Multi-threaded deals close at 2.3x the rate of single-threadedโ€ฆ but only 12% of reps consistently multi-thread

Your comp plan isnโ€™t just creating friction internally.
Itโ€™s literally destroying enterprise value ๐Ÿ’ธ.


๐Ÿš€ How to Realign Your Incentive Model

Incentives donโ€™t need โ€œfixing.โ€ They need realignment. Hereโ€™s the playbook:

๐Ÿ” 1. Add a Handoff Bonus to Every AE โ†’ CS Transition

Stop hoping for good handoffs. Pay for them.

Require a real warm intro, stakeholder mapping, and renewal risk review. No documentation = no commission release.

One portfolio company added a $500 handoff bonus per enterprise deal. Cost: $180K/year.
Savings: $2.3M in churn. ๐Ÿคฏ

๐ŸŽฏ 2. Pay SDRs on Qualified Pipeline (Not Meetings)

No more paying for booked meetings or attendance.
Pay on accepted pipeline that moves past Stage 2.

Yes, SDRs make less at first.
Within 90 days, good SDRs make more because AEs actually want their leads.
Bad SDRs self-select out.
Feature, not bug.

๐Ÿงฉ 3. Create a Multi-Threading Bonus Inside Opportunity Scoring

Reward early identification of finance, legal, and technical stakeholders.

Structure it like this:

  • 2% bonus for 3+ contacts engaged

  • 5% for 5+ contacts with next steps logged

Suddenly your reps become archaeologists ๐Ÿช–โ€”digging up every stakeholder who can say โ€œno.โ€

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ 4. Protect SE + Partner Involvement with Revenue Share Floors

Stop shaving their payout every time someone panics about the split.

Set a floor:

  • SEs get minimum 15% on deals they touch

  • Partners get 20% on deals they source

Watch your technical win rate jump 35% overnight ๐Ÿ“ˆ.

๐ŸŒฑ 5. Tie CS Comp to Expansion Readiness, Not Just Retention

Involve CS in expansion forecasting.
Bonus them on commercial influence, not just ticket close times.

Structure:

  • Base: 60%

  • Retention: 20%

  • Expansion influence: 20% (qualified opps they pass that close within 6 months)


๐Ÿงจ The Hard Truth About Team Selling

You canโ€™t culture your way out of a compensation problem.

If you want reps to act like owners, you have to pay them like co-owners.
That means sharing the wins, the losses, and the accountability for long-term customer success.

Your GTM engine isnโ€™t one superstar away from greatness.
Itโ€™s one well-designed incentive model away from actually working as a team.

Stop blaming reps for doing what you pay them to do.
Start paying them to do what you actually want ๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿค.


About Sales Assembly

Weโ€™re a resource for live, year-round skill development and certifications for the core roles within b2b revenue teams.ย  Contact us to explore membership options for your organization!